The
Supreme Court on Monday nullified the election of Emeka Ihedioha of the
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as the governor of Imo State.
The
apex court declared Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressive Congress (APC)
as the winner of the March 9 governorship election in the state.
In
the unanimous judgement of the seven-member panel, read by Justice
Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the apex court agreed that results in 388 polling
units were unlawfully excluded during the collation of the final
governorship election result in Imo State.
Justice Kekere-Ekun
said with the results from the 388 polling units added, Mr Uzodinma
polled a majority of the lawful votes and ought to have been declared
the winner of the election by the independent national electoral
commission, INEC.
Consequently, she voided and set aside the declaration of Mr lhedioha as the winner of the 2019 governorship election.
The
court ordered that the certificate of return wrongly or unlawfully
issued to Mr lhedioha be immediately withdrawn by the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC) and a fresh one be issued to Mr
Uzodinma as the elected governor.
“Vote due to the appellant
Senator Hope Uzodinma and the APC from 388 Polling Units were wrongly
excluded from scores ascribed to the appellant(to them).
“It is
thereby ordered that the appellant votes from 388 Polling Units
unlawfully excluded from the appellant vote declared shall be added and
that the first respondent, Emeka Ihedioha, was not duly elected by a
majority of lawful votes cast at the said election.”
“His return as the elected governor of Imo State is hereby declared null and void and accordingly set aside
“It
is hereby declared that the first appellant (Mr Uzodinma) holds the
majority of lawful votes cast at the governorship election held in Imo
State on March 9, 2019.”
The judge said Mr Uzodinma has satisfied the mandatory constitutional requirement.
“It
is hereby declared that first appellant, Senator Hope Uzodinma is the
winner of the governorship of Imo State held on March 9, 2019.
“The certificate issued to the first defendant (Mr Ihedioha) is hereby withdrawn.
“It
is hereby ordered that the certificate of return shall be issued to the
first appellant, Senator Hope Uzodinma, forthwith and he should be
sworn in as the governor of Imo State,” she ruled.
Lower court’s earlier decision
The Court of Appeal on November 19 had affirmed the victory of Mr Ihedioha as the governor of Imo State.
A
five-member panel of the court led by Oyebisi Omoleye delivered the
judgement following the appeals filed by the Action Alliance, All
Progressive Grand Alliance and the All Progressives Congress challenging
the election of the governor.
The appellants had argued that Mr
Ihedioha did not obtain the constitutionally required one-quarter of the
votes cast in at least two-thirds of the 27 local government areas of
the state, as provided under Section 179 of the Constitution.
The
appellants, therefore, asked the court to set aside the decision of the
election petition tribunal and declare them the winner of the election
or in the alternative order a rerun.
The Three Appeals
The
three appeals filed against the judgment of the Imo State Governorship
Election Petition Tribunal, which upheld the election of Mr Ihedioha,
include that of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA) and its
candidate, Ifeanyi Ararume; Action Alliance (AA) and its candidate, Uche
Nwosu and that of the APC and its candidate, Mr Uzodinma.
The
different appellants asked the Court of Appeal to void the election of
Mr Ihedioha on grounds that he did not obtain the constitutional
one-quarter of the votes in at least two-thirds of the 27 local
government areas of the state, in line with Section 179 of the
Constitution.
In their various submissions by their counsel, they
asked the court to set aside the decision of the tribunal and declare
them the winner of the March 9 governorship election or in the
alternative order the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
to conduct a fresh election into the office of Governor of Imo State.
The
three-member panel of the tribunal had in a unanimous decision
delivered on September 21 held that Mr Ihedioha was lawfully declared
the winner of the governorship election by INEC.
The panel led by
Justice Malami Dongondaji had in the judgment dismissed Messrs Ararume,
Nwosu and Uzodinma’s petitions for lacking in merit on the grounds that
they failed to prove the allegations made in their petitions.
Apart
from claims that Mr Ihedioha did not obtain the constitutional
one-quarter of the votes in at least two-thirds of the 27 local
government areas of the state, in line with the provisions of the law,
the petitioners had also alleged substantial non-compliance with the
Electoral Act and Guidelines, including other irregularities.
But
the tribunal in its judgement held that the case of the petitioners was
unmeritorious because they failed to call relevant witnesses and that
evidence of witnesses called were based on hearsay.
The tribunal,
in addition, rejected documents tendered by the petitioners in support
of their claims on the grounds that those who led evidence in the
documents were not the makers of the documents.
In his appeal, Mr
Ararume urged the appellate court to upturn the decision of the
tribunal on the grounds that the lower court erred in law when it
arrived at the decision that his case and that of his party lacked merit
and accordingly dismissed it.
The appeal which was predicated on
22 grounds was argued by his lead lawyer, Awal Kalu, while that of Mr
Nwosu and AA, was argued by Niyi Akintola. That of Mr Uzodinma and APC
was argued by Damian Dodo.
They all urged the panel to allow the appeal and grant all the relief sought by the appellants.
However,
lead counsel to Mr Ihedioha and the PDP, Onyechi Ikpeazu and Kaham
Ejelam respectively, urged the court to dismiss the appeals for being
incompetent and lacking in merit.
In a U-turn on Tuesday, Mr Nwosu withdrew his appeal, through his lawyer, Solomon Umoh.
He
withdrew the appeal based on a December 20 Supreme Court ruling that Mr
Nwosu was not a validly nominated candidate for the election.
The
respondents in the matter, including Mr Ihedioha and the PDP, did not
object to the application of Mr Nwosu to withdraw his appeal before the
apex court.
Consequently, the court dismissed Mr Nwosu’s appeal.
|
Posted by naijafm, Published at 3:33 AM and have
0
comments
No comments:
Post a Comment